Log in or Sign up
Stamp Exchange
Home
Forums
>
Stamp Collecting
>
Announcements & Rules
>
Welcome to the Stamp Exchange
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="philatelisteria, post: 3983, member: 152"]<b>Spam</b> is the use of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_messaging" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_messaging" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #0645ad">electronic messaging</span></a> systems (including most <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_media" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_media" rel="nofollow"><span style="color: #0645ad">broadcast media</span></a>, digital delivery systems) to send unsolicited bulk messages indiscriminately. It does not seem anyone has done that, what it does seem is that someone did complain and that Peter judged it to be bickering. Or am I unable to understand what has been written here.</p><p>Running a web site can be a very difficult and taxing business when many individuals are involved. Maybe more thought should be given to investigation prior to judgement. Everyone seems to be opinionated without actually asking for more information.</p><p>It is good that everyone has a voice as it were; but if it is just to hear ones own, where are the more timorous members going to end up? </p><p>I do not know anyone on this site, but it seems to me that tanrumstamp and admiral are not actually being asked why they are less than satisfied and are just having opinions fired at them. Please feel free to disagree, I am not precious, but if you do, ask me to qualify what I beleive rather than just telling me I am wrong.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="philatelisteria, post: 3983, member: 152"][B]Spam[/B] is the use of [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_messaging'][COLOR=#0645ad]electronic messaging[/COLOR][/URL] systems (including most [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_media'][COLOR=#0645ad]broadcast media[/COLOR][/URL], digital delivery systems) to send unsolicited bulk messages indiscriminately. It does not seem anyone has done that, what it does seem is that someone did complain and that Peter judged it to be bickering. Or am I unable to understand what has been written here. Running a web site can be a very difficult and taxing business when many individuals are involved. Maybe more thought should be given to investigation prior to judgement. Everyone seems to be opinionated without actually asking for more information. It is good that everyone has a voice as it were; but if it is just to hear ones own, where are the more timorous members going to end up? I do not know anyone on this site, but it seems to me that tanrumstamp and admiral are not actually being asked why they are less than satisfied and are just having opinions fired at them. Please feel free to disagree, I am not precious, but if you do, ask me to qualify what I beleive rather than just telling me I am wrong.[/QUOTE]
Log in with Facebook
Log in with Twitter
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Stamp Exchange
Home
Forums
>
Stamp Collecting
>
Announcements & Rules
>
Welcome to the Stamp Exchange
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...