Need Stanley Gibbon's number on this one.

I can't fine the SG # ? for Scott 738, the flat plate printing with perforation of 11 x 11.

I do have the SG # 736 for Scott 737, the rotary press printing with perforation of 11 x 10 1/2.
Is the SG # 737?

The stamp is
Series: 1934 Commemorative
Description: Mothers of America : “Portrait of my Mother” by Whistler
Face Value: 3 cents

 

View attachment 2252

 

Also I need the SG # for the Farley Follies of the same stamp.
It is without gum and no perforations and it is Scott # 754

View attachment 2253

 

I have another I need the SG # for?
Series: 1935 Special Printing {Farley's Follies}
Description: Wisconsin Tercentenary
Face Value: 3 cents
Scott # is 755
View attachment 2255

 

And yet another one in need of a SG #.

Series: 1935 Special Printing {Farley's Follies}​

Description: Great Seal of the United States​

Face Value: 16 cents​

Scott # is 771​

Air Mail Special Delivery​

View attachment 2256
​

 

Tom see attached from 2006 SG World
For current (cat) values, use SG # and go to
http://www.allworldstamps.com/index.asp?context=on&cid=580&sid=&year=&year_t=&sg=&sg_t=&range=N

Cat states perf or imperf


BTW It's nice to be using books where USA is at the Back

 

another

 

They saved the best for last I guess

 

The first I have and it looks like they use the same number for perf and unperf

 

on the air mais I read it as AE 750 for the blue one

 

The tercentenery is SG 738 - but no mention of perf variations

 

SG World is just an " overview" sometimes you have drill down further for variations via a specialised catalogue

Anyway , hope they helped

 

The scott for The tercentenery is 739 and the SG is 738 Perf 11 x 11​

 

Yes that helped Thank you so much.

 

??? are you agreeing with me here - or disputing only I am confused ( well more than normal that is )

 

No I am not disputing the finer details can be very interesting from one catalogue to another. The Scott's gave me all the numbers and the other main catalogue is SG. I was trying to get both sets of numbers for reference. And not having the SG and not using it as I use the Scotts it gets tough. Disputing you, no way your are THE Bionicbelly.