upper: 1856/58 4 Annas (8 As.is missing) lower: stamp for soldier´s letters,issued May 9th,1860. The 8 Pies stamp was the first issue by the Crown Colony Government. The earliar ones had been issued by the East India Company.
I have often wondered why some of the GB colonies shifted to the small, definitive size stamps for the high values of a set. Anyone know? Don
Sorry....posted this in the wrong thread.I have no idea why these high values were more like definitive stamps. Colonies such as St Lucia and St Vincent issued series with mostly all definitive style stamps..I will post them later.....hopefully in the correct thread
upper stamp: 4 As.in new colour,issued in 1864 lower stamps: previous stamps,now on watermarked paper "Elephant´s Head" issued 1865. (sorry for the inverted 2 As.!) missing:8 Pies.,1,4,8 Annas The 1/2 Anna was reissued in 1873,now with queen´s opened lips.
The early issues of service stamps are rather pricy.This is very much true for a set of five overprinted revenue stamps,issued 1866 (Sc.nos.O11-O15), with an cat.value exceeding € 10.000.-. I can show only one of them and that is no original,but a reprint,or better official imitation.The overprint slightly differs from that of originals. Michel values the reprints at 60% of the prices of originals. A similar defintive,a 6 Annas value,was issued June 28th,1866.
Werner....What is the catalogue value of item shown ? Do you know if Gibbons lists the reprints ? Bob
Bob, Gibbons,as well as Scott footnote the "reprints" quite detailed,but give no prices for them.However my "latest" Gibbons is the 1989 edition. Michel´s footnote is less detailed,but prices them 40% cheaper than the originals. Michel for the mint original 4 Annas is € 4500.-.So the reprint would be € 2700.-. I do not remember,when and where and at what price I got that stamp. Werner
Gibbons India Specialized "So-called reprints of Nos. 015 to 018 are known, but in these the surcharge differs entirely in the spacing, etc., of the words; they are more properly described as Government imitations. The imitations of No. 015 have surcharge in black or in green." Given their description as imitations it would not appear they have much value Yours may not be a reprint as the word spacing is very different see below The one you show should have a green overprint as this certified one below (light to dark green depending on wear) The letters also do not match The surface wear is also very typical of this issue Unfortunately that does not leave many options for the one you posted
A few other India Classics 1854, Deep Vermilion, 91/2 Arches SG 1a - unissued stamp 1854, Deep Red SG 11; Scott 4 Die I
In regard to post #436: 211 BakerStr., I have to admit,that I cannot get the point of your post.I don´t know what you want to say. Regards Werner
221Bakerstr. and 221Bakerstr.2 the same person ? Or just more incarnations of R... ? But back to Scott O13,or the "reprint" of it. The differences between originals and reprints a) the overprint of the reprint is of a darker green than that of the original. b) the size of SERVICE ang POSTAGE on reprints is a good deal smaller than on originals. I doubt that forgeries of the reprints do exist at all. Firstly,you would need the Revenue Stamp.I am no Revenue Stamps collector, but my best guess is,that at least in mint condition,they will be anything but common. Secondly why should a forgerer produce a reprint ? It would be no more difficult to make an "original",what are more expensive and more in demand.
Werner.....not all forgers are what you would describe as intellectually sound.Reminds me of a famous Irish counterfeiter who altered 2UKL coins to make them look like 1UKL coins........ Bob