2 printings of fishy stamp 1880 -red orange 1887 - orange Both same value Reunion SG 197 YV 189.......France Libre Overprint from 1943 1. Used copies are more difficult to find than unused 2. As the highest value it is generally forged esp. in unused, so used is actually safer to find used provided the overprint is below the cancel This is a genuine Letters in a straight line, the right leg of the n is short, the 2nd e is higher than the first one, no letters touch These are from some generally high calibre auctions but still fakes Letters tilt down Ovpt is smaller and letters touch The F & L are too thick and lacking genuine traits
Rustamps.....Frstamps.... I originally asked if you had a used copy hidden away in that vast collection of 150m stamps.This would appear to be one of the few stamps you don,t own.A simple yes or no would have been ok,instead of telling me information I already know. In future,I think you should think about another user name.Maybe SFAstamps ? Bob
Sorry I did not know that you were aware about the cod stamps or the fact that most France Libre stamps are fakes and how to tell them apart. So much knowledge here. I am impressed or maybe disappointed and wondering what you are talking about. I tried to impart some information that appeared lacking and requested. Your reply is like Stampboards or their moderator. Perhaps this other member can better assist you. Maybe you know how to look up my IP address 194.187.251.4 in Belgium Sorry to have troubled you - . Regards - and good luck with other members Francois Richard {FRstamps}
RuStamps/FrStamps: One and the same? Sure looks like it to me. If not, how is it that FrStamps answered the query to RuStamps without any explanation for doing so? Come on guy, stop playing games. Similar style in choosing user names, both experts on fakes and forgeries, both scanning experts, both 61 years old, both English as a 2nd language, both use sarcasm in their replies, coincidental?, probably not in my opinion. Don
One of my favourite countries of the classical times: Mecklenburg-Schwerin issued July 1st,1856 Mecklenburg-Schwerin had a head post office and a "post expedition" in Hamburg.
Sorry I cannot help it The image leaves me at loss over is this 2a or 2b or some new variety 2a dark chrome yellow 2b Yellow Orange Hopefully Don will like
issued Dec.1865 (ordinary paper),on laid paper issued Sept.1864 Same stamp,but with dotted background,rouletted,issued July 1st,1864 is expensive. Same stamp,but with dotted background imperforated,issuedJuly 1st,1856. The stamps could be used intact as 1 Schilling,or seperated into all possible units. A single 1/4 Schilling cannot exist on mail alone,but in combination with other stamps only. So,Annie,get your gun !
1864 Mi 4 Surely this one deserves a like??? Maybe this MI 7 & 8 gets a like? If you really like I will show the backs also
5 Schilling ordinary paper,issued Sept.1864 Mecklenburg-Schwerin issued 8 stamps only.None of those is cheap,but only one,the rouletted 4/4 Schilling with dotted background from 1864 is expensive. It is often faked by either rouletting the 1856 imperforated one or by adding the dots onto the one,issued later in the same year (1864).The same I showed before,issued in Dec.1856,but this on laid paper.
I. The rouletted points on the stamp NEVER show up that well. Don't stay on when stamps separated 2. There should be some specific breaks in 3 spots on crown 3. The top serif on first top E should slant more 4. The frame lines on the bottom too uneven and wavy 5. Right E is wrongly slanted and all letters not in straight line 6. The cross is wrong shape 7. Fake perfs on Fake stamp
Although India is one of the countries I collect,I do not own many classics. So,no "Scinde Distric Dawks",but: upper stamp: one Anna,issued Oct.1854 (there is also a 1/2 and a 2 Annas) lower stamp: eight Annas,bluish paper,issued Oct.1855.(4 As.is missing)
I only have a few of these but Mr Salentin said on this forum and on TSF that it is OK to post catalog images of stamps you don't have. Enjoy I have a few hundred pages to post. So I start with Papal States
Again the 1854 1 Anna definitive: upper: plate I hair and chignon rather white lower plate II hair and chignon seperated by a white line,smudged print Plate description according to Michel !
Well Michel is definitely the authority HOWEVER it does not take into account plate wear prevalent with these so you need to use more than chignons and white spaces to identify them