Scott# 479 $2 Madison & 480 $5 Marshall

Discussion in 'United States Stamps' started by kacyds, Feb 4, 2012.

  1. kacyds Well-Known Member

    Bought a lot on ebay last week, and final getting around to posting some of them. The Scott 479 & 480 is from the series of 1916-17. Hope everyone enjoys. I sure do :D

    479-480.jpg
    steve logan and Larry L. Taylor like this.
  2. steve logan Logie Bear (Moderator)

    very nice and according to the catalogue quite valuable in used condition, the 2 dollar is reasonably well centered as well

    well done
  3. kacyds Well-Known Member

    Yes it is, Thanks Steve
  4. kacyds Well-Known Member

    U.S. #479
    Series of 1916-17 $2 Madison

    Issue Date: March 22, 1917
    Printed by: Bureau of Engraving and Printing
    Printing Method: Flat plate
    Watermark: None
    Perforation: 10
    Color: Dark blue

    U.S. #480
    Series of 1916-17 $5 Marshall

    Issue Date: March 22, 1917
    Printed by: Bureau of Engraving and Printing
    Printing Method: Flat plate
    Watermark: None
    Perforation: 10
    Color: Light green

    The U.S. Postal Service was faced with a sudden and unexpectedly high demand for high-denomination postage stamps early in 1917. The large numbers of heavy machine parts shipped to Russia required high postage amounts. U.S. #479 was also used to send valuable Liberty Bond shipments. U.S. #480 was used to send valuable Liberty Bond shipments, and also to pay for fund transfers between postal departments.

    The only differences between the 1902 and 1917 issues were that the earlier stamp was perf 12 and printed on double watermark paper. The 1917 issues were perf 10, on unwatermarked paper. Also, the 1917 stamp is a lighter shade of green.

    The Post Office did not have time to prepare new designs to meet the need, so the Series of 1902 master dies were used for the $2 Madison and $5 Marshall issues. The original plates and transfer rollers had already been destroyed.
    steve logan likes this.
  5. swish513 Moderator

    nice stamps kris!
    kacyds likes this.
  6. Jay Well-Known Member

    Whoa! 2 stamps that I'll probably never own just due to cost alone. Very nicely done kacyds. I thought these was from Series 1902 set? Still a wonderful addition!
  7. kacyds Well-Known Member

    Jay, the 1902 series had a perf 12, while these have a perf 10. Although I wished they were perf 12. Then they would be worth so much more, lol Thanks.
  8. steve logan Logie Bear (Moderator)

  9. Jay Well-Known Member

    They're not too terribly unreasonable are they? Looks nice.
    steve logan likes this.
  10. steve logan Logie Bear (Moderator)

    i know i will be bidding on the pair, although i will only want 1 for my collection, i do not keep pairs unless they are catalogued, so would have one spare if i won that is ;)
  11. kacyds Well-Known Member

    Looks good Steve. Be patient lol
  12. kacyds Well-Known Member

    Jay, I do have $2 from the 1902 series. Its has a perf 12. 312.jpg
    Jay likes this.
  13. Jay Well-Known Member

    Nice! You lucky codger you. lol
    kacyds likes this.
  14. kacyds Well-Known Member

    Thanks for the new word, I had to google it......lol:D
  15. Jay Well-Known Member

    I been hanging out with the Aussies too long...lol
    kacyds likes this.

Share This Page